I wanted to become an academic economist after discovering the Austrian school as an undergraduate. This prompted an interest in economic methodology and I’ve written articles that explain (and defend) methodological individualism; and argued that recent developments in the Austrian school have extended the use of thought experiments to create an entire family of comparative and counterfactual analysis research strategies. I believe that there is currently a second revival in Austrian economics, and wrote a brief survey of contemporary developments in the Austrian school of economics, signalling that: (i) the amount of Austrian research and the number of Austrian researchers is growing exponentially; (ii) good Austrian economists are not being marginalised by the economics profession; and (iii) there have been significant advances in our understanding of economics made recently.
I have also documented the spread of the Austrian school in Central and Eastern Europe following the fall of the Berlin Wall, providing a rare history of “centre-right” political ideas in Eastern Europe; a chronology of the development and influence of libertarianism; cursory intellectual biographies of neglected Austrian economists; and empirical evidence that contributes to the epistemic communities approach to the study of idea diffusion.
My dissertation advisor was Peter J. Boettke (pictured above), who I view as the dean of the contemporary Austrian movement. I’ve utilised experiential evidence to argue that he utilises a successful pedagogical philosophy that is common to being both a sports coach and graduate teacher. I also believe that the “case method” is a pedagogical method that should be of interest to Austrian school economists. Not only can it provide students with a richer learning experience, but there are important methodological points of tangency.
As an instructor of managerial economics I try to employ innovative pedagogical techniques. I have created an app to help students learn about the financial crisis, and a simulation to understand the EU debt problem. I’ve also tried to champion the Dynamic AD-AS model.
If you are a student interested in learning more about Austrian economics, see these posts:
I believe that Austrian business cycle theory is both highly important and severely misunderstood. I’ve provided a simple framework for comparing Austrian approaches with Monetarism and Keynesianism, surveyed increasing attention to Austrian ideas in mainstream media, and claimed that it deserves a place at the top table of policy debate. Contemporary economic commentators tend to dismiss the Austrian position, so I have clarified what Austrian business cycle theory does and does not claim as true.
In a broad and wide ranging theoretical article I’ve attempted to look at Austrian business cycle theory in light of rational expectations, in particular at the role of heterogeneity, the monetary footprint, and adverse selection in monetary expansion. I’ve looked at the upper turning point of the boom bust cycle, and written about how access to finance impedes entrepreneurship. Empirically, I’ve argued that the monetary base still matters and found an estimate of the natural rate of interest for the UK economy.
I’ve attempted to disentangle the heterogeneous nature of entrepreneurship with some interesting empirical applications. I’ve used the Sunday Times Rich List to claim that those who fell out of the top 100 as a consequence of the credit crunch were disproportionately likely to have been recent new entries. And I’ve used Property Ladder to illustrate ways in which the 1994-2007 UK housing boom is a manifestation of the Austrian theory of the business cycle. I’ve also written a book chapter that utilised the concepts of “regime uncertainty” and “Big Players” to the financial crisis in the UK.
I have also attempted to contribute to the literature on free banking, both in terms of pointing out scholarly flaws in criticisms of fractional reserve banking, and defending the legitimacy of (voluntary) demand deposit contracts, (twice).
- Special reports:
- “What is the natural rate of interest?“, September 2016
- “The Upper Turning Point“, June 2016
- “The Paradox of Prediction“, March 2016
- “The Monetary Situation“, October 2014
- “An introduction to a new measure of the money supply: MA“, June 2011 (Note: see the updates here)
- “Projections Past and Future: Economic Imagination and the Financial Crisis 2007 – 2012“, August 2009
- Quarterly Reports:
- “Choose Your Own Financial Crisis” Quarterly Report No. 12, June 2014
- “Welcome to the great stagnation” Quarterly Report No. 11, March 2014
- Markets for Managers Focus Group, November 2013
- “The Yakiniku recovery” Quarterly Report No. 9, September 2013
- 2013 NGDPLT Summit: Copenhagen, May 2013
- “Can we measure uncertainty?” Quarterly Report No. 7, March 2013
- “The Unintended Consequences of Extraordinary Policy“, Quarterly Report No. 6, December 2012
- “Imagining an Optimal Language Area“, Quarterly Report No. 5, September 2012
- “Austerity and the passage of time“, Quarterly Report No. 4, June 2012
- “Malinvestment in China?“, Quarterly Report No. 3, March 2012
- “The perils of NGDP targeting“, Quarterly Report No. 2, December 2011
- “The varieties of economic experience“, Quarterly Report No. 1, August 2011
- Longer blog posts
- New estimates of productivity norm inflation, September 2016
- The stylised facts of the crack-up boom, September 2016
- Thoughts on the savings glut hypothesis, September 2016
- The lethargic recovery, September 2016
- The policymakers view of the great recession – a dynamic AD-AS analysis May 2016
- The rise of Austrian Business Cycle theory (ABC), March 2016
- QE-a culpa, May 2015
- Roundaboutness, April 2014
- Bank of England on money creation, March 2014
- Some public sector net investment scenarios…, March 2013
- The resource cost of a gold standard, September 2012
“Between private, subjective perception and public, physical science there lies culture, a middle area of shared beliefs and values”
Douglas & Wildavsky, 1982:194
Companies can and do build unique constitutional orders, and there’s lots of potential to apply the field of Constitutional Political Economy to the study of organisations. One example of constitutional management that I am especially interested in is Market-Based Management (R), which treats the institutions that generate economic prosperity as being analogous to the institutions that improve corporate performance.
My desire to understand corporate culture in a broad way, rooted firmly in social anthropology, led me to the Grid/Group (or “Cultural Theory”) typology pioneered by Mary Douglas. I was fortunate to meet her several times before she passed away and we worked on an application of Cultural Theory to organisational behaviour. I have attempted to bridge cultural theory with an epistemic and institutional approach to economics, and highlight some methodological parallels with Austrian economics.
Some of the examples of the usefulness of a Cultural Theory approach to organisational culture are internal prediction markets, and whistleblowing. In terms of the latter, I provide an explanation for why legislative and internal systems typically fail, and suggest ways to nourish a culture of dissent as a strategic advantage. My work on whistleblowing led to several trade journal articles and some media coverage.
“[Adam] Smith had no typical understanding of sympathy but rather came to terms with the concept through a very careful observation of others. It’s an outsider’s view and that is why it is so perceptive” (Cowen, T., 2009, ‘Create your own economy’, Dutton, p.170)
On 15th March 2015 I decided that I would no longer participate in the research community that explores Grid-Group Theory. I had an outline for a book project but recognised that it’s not a priority, and probably will never be one. Rather than become a hermit in order to study the world, I just wanted to become one.
“Why should he write, he would ask, when he could read fifty times as much in the time it would have taken him to produce some academic article of little worth” (Polonsky, R., 2010 ‘Molotov’s Magic Lantern’, Faber and Faber) – in reference to the Russian academic Apollon Grigoriev
“This has been my last hunt. Too old. Farewell, beasts that I shall not kill. You are one of the fascinating and cruel faces of life, and life is passing away. What must be done will be done by others. Farewell.” (Ryzhik, in ‘The Case of Comrade Tulayev’ by Victor Serge, (New York Review Book , 2004))
I still have plans to run an MBA course called “Corporate Cultural Theory“. I am collecting cases and if I find sufficient interest (either from co-instructors, universities, or potential students) then I will pick it back up again.
For an indication, see my 2007 article: “Towards a Corporate Cultural Theory“. It was published as a working paper by the Mercatus Center, and it also appeared in a Semiotics course on Cultural Theory.
- In July 2007 I organised a “Workshop on Cultural Theory and Management“, hosted by ESCP Europe (see here for the running order).
- In January 2011 I attended a conference on Cultural Theory in Leuven. Here are my remarks. My situation hasn’t changed.
I also believe that Cultural Theory can help to explain the fascinating social dynamics that occur in Office Christmas Parties. Just after the launch of ‘The Office‘ there was a fly on the wall documentary called ‘The Armstrongs‘. You can find some episodes on YouTube, but the pilot episode (filmed in 2003) isn’t available. After I blogged about the series I received a DVD through the post from one of the production team. This is important because it focused on the Christmas Party. One of the best ever filmed was in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. And indeed it’s no coincidence that the high point of the UK series of ‘The Office’ was Tim and Dawn’s kiss, which occurred at a Christmas Party. My ambition was to conduct an anthropological study of the Christmas Party. One day
If you are considering doing research in this area, please get in touch. I have lots of material and ideas but they are now dormant.
During my graduate studies I specialised in the field of Public Choice. I took classes with Charles Rowley and Gordon Tullock, and attended James Buchanan‘s seminar. However I felt there was a tension between the “Virginia” school and “Chicago” school. I’ve argued that the latter approach reached a dead end, and advocated a distinctly subjectivist approach to political economy based on the core insight of the “Epistemic Primacy Thesis”. An example of this is the difference between radical and rational ignorance – if people acquire information through “browse” rather than “search” there is scope for a genuine theory of error.
I’ve attempted to apply a subjectivist approach to public choice theory to the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe. I’ve utilised the concepts of operational codes, epistemic communities and the structure patterns of ideas to argue that “constitutional moments” show how ideas can can underpin and direct the formation of interest groups.
As part of the Mercatus Center‘s “Global Prosperity Initiative” I undertook fieldwork in Liverpool’s Chinatown to understand the economic organisation of ethnic communities. In particular I used interviews, surveys and observation to show how the availability of regeneration funds can create incentives for voluntary community associations (i.e. “clubs”) to switch into predatory rent-seeking collectives.
I have also done fieldwork in Romania to understand the spread of the flat tax. I utilised the “economic theology” literature to claim that whilst ideas are usually adopted for their empirical and operational content, if this is lacking, due to the novelty of the idea, or the uncertainty of the political environment (for example when following regime change), their normative content can generate a crucial carrying capacity. I have also introduced and applied a synthetic comparative method to study its spread in nine Eastern Europe countries.
My 2009 book, The Neoliberal Revolution in Eastern Europe, (co-authored with Paul Dragos Aligica) develops two research agendas: the study of the spread of ‘neoliberalism’ – as seen from the perspective of Eastern European post-communist evolutions; and the study of Eastern European transition – as seen from an ideas-centred perspective.